
INTRODUCTION
Psychological and creative debate has increasingly focused on the intricate relationships between touch, sensory experience, and aesthetic evaluation. Conventional theories, such as those proposed by E.H. Gombrich asserts that our appreciation of art primarily relies on higher-order cognitive processes influenced by beliefs and prior knowledge; however, an increasing body of evidence underscores the significant role that embodied emotions and tactile experiences play in shaping our perception and enjoyment of art. This study transcends mere visual engagement to include a multi-sensory experience, hence emphasising the nuanced influence of touch on creative perspective (Eskine et al., 2012). Touch serves as a potent emotional mediator in human interaction, enhancing emotional connection and overall well-being. In the context of aesthetic experiences, the texture and materiality of an artwork may evoke unique emotional responses, making this emotional engagement crucial. . Texture perception is influenced by both tactile and visual stimuli, suggesting that certain textures may elicit either comfort or discomfort, shaping the viewer’s overall experience. According to recent studies, comprehensive textural perception is an interplay between visual and tactile modalities, suggesting that the brain integrates information from multiple sensory channels to form a unified experience (Ferreira, 2019). One cannot ignore the function of multisensory integration. When viewers interact with art, both tactile and visual signals help to determine their whole sensory assessment. This phenomena is seen not just in daily contacts with items but also in creative settings, where the texture appearance may change expectations and impressions of tactile involvement (Kurotobi et al., 2018). Smoothness or roughness is one of the physical characteristics that most influences the experience of an artwork. Studies on people’s emotional and cognitive responses to different textures have revealed how they influence aesthetic judgments
Furthermore, defining the basic mechanisms behind sensory impressions helps to understand the neuroscience of touch and perception. Somatosensory areas have been shown to have predictive properties of perceptual processing in response to visual cues associated with texture. This suggests that tactile impressions have complex predictive mechanisms influencing cognitive and emotional feelings. When people perceive the texture of an object, their brain may trigger the same neural pathways used in real tactile stimulation ( Suzuishi et al., 2020 ). Thus, artwork emphasizing tactile elements induces an active experience, beyond passive gazing. Finally, how tactile interactions interact with environmental factors such as smell and sound improves our understanding of the entire nature of the creative experience. For example, ambient scents have been shown to influence our emotional responses to artwork, and when combined with tactile interactions, this can provide a broader, more varied perceptual experience (Lezcan & Drewing, 2017). This underscores a more nuanced approach to aesthetic perception by suggesting that the overall experience of an artwork can be composed of an interconnected network of sensory inputs.
Touch, sensory perception and texture interact in art, showing how important an omniscient approach is when considering the role of different sensory modalities in creating aesthetic experience. In order to interact more effectively with art at both cognitive and affective levels, we must know how tactile experiences alter psychological and emotional outcomes.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Investigating the psychological aspects of touch offers a complex perspective of human contact with the creative environment as well as with each other. Our experiences are shaped most by our sense of touch, which also profoundly affects our emotional and cognitive impressions. Through techniques like mindfulness meditation and physical disciplines like yoga, a growing corpus of research highlights how tactile sensations could improve psychological well-being, create emotional bonds, and even change cognitive functioning.
Studies have shown neuroplasticity connected to changes in tactile acuity resulting from different mind-body practices. (Küçükosmanoğlu et al. 2023) observed, for example, that yoga practice greatly improves cervical tactile acuity and body awareness, hence modifying neuroplasticity processes in somatosensory cortices. By stressing interoceptive awareness, such mind-body techniques including qigong and tai chi help people become more sensitive to bodily sensations that support the mastery of tactile perception (Flaherty & Connolly, 2014). These activities highlight the link between tactile awareness and emotional control, therefore implying a framework in which emotional well-being is not just cognitive but also quite physical. Particularly mindfulness meditation has become very effective in changing cognitive performance and sensory processing. Studies show that, even in cases of tactile distractions, mindfulness training helps more effectively allocate brain resources during activities requiring sensory processing (Wang et al., 2019). This implies that as demonstrated by changes in EEG markers during tactile distractions, practitioners acquire more somatosensory control skills, which results in improved attention-focused mechanisms. This physiological adaptation thereby emphasises the complicated link among touch, attention, and cognitive task performance. Moreover, researchers looking at per personal space (PPS) and how it changes during focused-attention activities (Chiarella et al., 2024) have revealed how the limits of physical self-representation change during mindfulness meditation. Those who practice mindfulness not only improve their somatosensory representations but also develop a more strong feeling of connectivity to their bodies, therefore influencing their emotional reactions to tactile encounters. Integration of tactile and sensory events goes beyond personal awareness. Therapeutic treatments, for instance, help to illustrate the social and relational aspects of touch. Within the field of child and adolescent psychiatry, tactile massage has been shown to increase empathy and trust between patients and carers, therefore promoting psychological recovery (Robertz & Rudolfsson, 2016).
This emphasises how touch supports compensation and emotional communication, therefore confirming its function in therapeutic contacts. Maternal touch also reacts to emotional states and developmental demands, therefore underlining the significance of touch within the context of early infant development .Emphasising the broad relevance of touch from infancy throughout life, tactile interactions here serve regulatory purposes and give a means for developing emotional intelligence and responsiveness. Literary works expose interesting dynamics when one investigates the interaction between tactile sensations and artistic appreciation. Where tactile input mixes with visual cues to provide a deeper interaction with artworks, touch may greatly affect the aesthetic impression of art. Still, present knowledge on multisensory interactions is complex, and further research is required to define these dynamics (Cirrincione et al., 2014). Moreover, research on immersive interactions where tactile and auditory cues combine showcase a transforming power for our perception of art in multimodal surroundings (Wagener et al., 2022).
It is clear as our knowledge of tactile perception develops that this sense is not only important in interpersonal connections but also in creative involvement, sensory integration, and emotional control. Using a variety of approaches from neuroimaging to behavioural studies researchers are revealing the significant effects of touch on our emotional and cognitive life. The continuous study of the psychology of touch therefore creates fresh opportunities for examining well-being, creative appreciation, and the human experience.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Using an exploratory method, which will concentrate on thorough, detailed narratives of participants’ encounters with textured artworks. The project intends to show the subtle ways in which touch affects perception and emotional interaction with art by gathering personal stories and sensory observations.
Electing of subjects: Focusing individuals who frequently engage with art, participants will be recruited from surrounding universities, museums, and creative places.
Commitment of a varied set of people including artists, art students, and casual art addicts will help to capture diverse perceptions .
Methodological Qualitative Research: The method will be focused on groups and semi-structured interviews. These conversations will observe participants’ cognitive and emotional reactions to textured artworks. While focus groups will enable group reflections, therefore promoting deeper conversations on sensory perception in creative encounters, the interviews will provide personal insights into how touch either improves or reduces their enjoyment of art.
Habitual trends and unique points of view will be found by means of theme analysis, therefore providing a complex knowledge of the function of touch in art appreciation. Research already under publication (Asimakidou et al., 2022) emphasises the need of experiential storytelling in comprehending sensory experience.
Neurophysiology valuation: A small group of participants will go further into the sensory experience by talking about how their emotional and brain states change in tactile interaction. They will consider how certain textures arouse particular feelings, memories, or sensory connections, therefore providing even another level of insight on the relationship between physical contact and emotional resonance. Previous studies (Kilteni et al., 2018; Kilteni et al., 2023) have shown that brain pathways play a role in how touch is incorporated into perceptual experience, and this study will investigate these issues by means of qualitative talks.
Evaluating Information: Common themes like emotions, and sensory interpretations rising from participants’ stories will be found using thematic analysis. Focusing on subjective experiences, the research seeks to provide thorough understanding of how tactile encounters with art improve emotional involvement, trigger memory, and increase cognitive appreciation.
Moral Issues: Before starting the research, all participants will provide informed permission, thus that ethical issues are satisfied. Therefore, the privacy and the voluntary character of participation will especially be given special emphasis thus enabling people the opportunity to quit at any moment without facing repercussions.
This qualitative research aims to provide a thorough investigation of how enjoyment of visual art is shaped by touch, sensory experience, and texture form. Emphasising its function in strengthening emotional and cognitive connections with creative experiences, the study seeks to enhance the knowledge of tactile involvement in art by gathering rich personal stories and shared conversations.
Results/Findings
Examining the psychological impacts of touch and texture in art exposes the complex ways in which tactile events determine emotional and cognitive reactions to artworks. Reviewing several research on this topic helps us understand how tactile connection improves art enjoyment and perception. A major component of artistic delight is the emotional connection created by active interaction with art. Tactile connection changes viewers’ perception of artworks. A surface’s texture may set off a spectrum of emotional reactions, therefore enhancing the sensory richness of the creative process. This phenomena fits psychological studies suggesting that before conscious awareness arises, bodily experiences frequently set off emotions. Touching many textures may evoke either pleasure or pain, comfort or discomfort therefore highlighting the great emotional impact of tactile experiences.
Moreover, studies underline the part tactile exploration plays in cognitive participation. Individuals’ sensory awareness increases clearly when they physically touch textured surfaces, which shapes their impression of the artwork. This increased sensory involvement implies that art is experienced dynamically by many senses rather than just visually. Perception turns out to be an active interaction between sensory inputs forming emotional and cognitive reactions, not a passive action.
Combining touch with visual elements that is, integrating many sensory experiences helps to increase the whole depth and value of art. The sense of texture and shape becomes more immersive when tactile experiences enhance visual images, therefore enabling a greater involvement. This interaction of many sensory modalities highlights how multisensory experiences intensify emotional and intellectual reactions to art, hence producing a layered and dynamic enjoyment.
Touch is involved in social and community creative events as well as in personal engagement. Interactive artworks, installations, and seminars promoting tactile interaction help participants to connect. Particularly in group or therapeutic environments, hands-on artistic activities foster shared experiences, trust and emotional safety. This feature of art emphasises its function as a means of group participation and human contact.
Furthermore, influencing perception of touch and texture in art are cultural elements. Different customs provide different degrees of importance on tactile touch, which shapes how people work with creative materials. Touch is closely entwined with emotional expression in various societies, therefore providing even another level of perception of creative works. Knowing these cultural points of view helps one to see how tactile involvement becomes a socially ingrained habit and goes beyond personal experience.
Promoting tactile-based creative experiences depends significantly on curators and teachers. Including touch into art education improves learning settings and advances not only creative appreciation but also emotional intelligence and critical thinking. Encouragement of hands-on involvement with artworks helps students to acquire a better awareness of creative expression, therefore enhancing the relevance and impact of the experience.
In the end, the junction of psychology, sensory experience, and artistic texture exposes the fundamental part touch plays in forming cognitive interaction with art and emotional reactions. The physicality of artistic contact is not just an extra but a fundamental factor for people’s connection to creative works. This knowledge emphasises the need of treating touch as a primary component in creative appreciation, therefore transcending the limits of art to include more than just visual sense. Understanding the value of physical touch helps one to appreciate art holistically and to accept the complexity of human sensory connections. This viewpoint not only increases participation with art but also guides activities in cultural institutions, therapeutic environments, and educational systems, therefore improving the relationship between people and the creative manifestations that speak to them.
References
- Asimakidou, Eleni, X. Job, and Katerina Kilteni. “The Positive Dimension of Schizotypy is Associated with a Reduced Attenuation and Precision of Self-Generated Touch.” bioRxiv, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.22.476743.
- Baingana, M. “Food Texture Perception and Its Influence on Consumer Preferences.” Journal of Food Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, 2024, pp. 43–55. https://doi.org/10.47941/jfs.1847.
- Bourdier, A., A. Abriat, and T. Jiang. “Impacts of Sensory Multimodality Congruence and Familiarity with Short Use on Cosmetic Product Evaluation.” International Journal of Cosmetic Science, vol. 45, no. 5, 2023, pp. 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12863.
- Chiarella, S., R. Pastina, A. Raffone, and L. Simione. “Mindfulness Affects the Boundaries of Bodily Self-Representation: The Effect of Focused-Attention Meditation in Fading the Boundary of Peripersonal Space.” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14, no. 4, 2024, p. 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040306.
- Cirrincione, A., Z. Estes, and A. Carù. “The Effect of Ambient Scent on the Experience of Art: Not as Good as It Smells.” Psychology and Marketing, vol. 31, no. 8, 2014, pp. 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20722.
- Council, S. “Conceptual Framework in Public Health Nutrition and Dietetics Research.” Special Journal of Public Health Nutrition and Dietetics, 2020. https://doi.org/10.61915/pnd.183435.
- Crucianelli, L., L. Wheatley, M. Filippetti, P. Jenkinson, E. Kirk, and A. Fotopoulou. “The Mindedness of Maternal Touch: An Investigation of Maternal Mind-Mindedness and Mother-Infant Touch Interactions.” Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 35, 2019, pp. 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.01.010.
- Debrot, A., D. Schoebi, M. Perrez, and A. Horn. “Touch as an Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Process in Couples’ Daily Lives.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 10, 2013, pp. 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497592.
- Dube, B., and D. Nkomo. “Implementation of Open and Distance Learning Programmes in Primary Teacher Education in Zimbabwe.” Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 7, no. 11, 2022, p. e001629. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i11.1629.
- Eskine, K., N. Kacinik, and J. Prinz. “Stirring Images: Fear, Not Happiness or Arousal, Makes Art More Sublime.” Emotion, vol. 12, no. 5, 2012, pp. 1071–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027200.
- Ferreira, B. “Packaging Texture Influences Product Taste and Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of Sensory Studies, vol. 34, no. 6, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12532.
- Field, T. Touch. MIT Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9959.001.0001.
- Flaherty, M., and M. Connolly. “A Preliminary Investigation of Lumbar Tactile Acuity in Yoga Practitioners.” International Journal of Yoga Therapy, vol. 24, no. 1, 2014, pp. 43–50. https://doi.org/10.17761/ijyt.24.1.410l848272013px2.
- Hasanah, N., R. Alfi, R. Rifkiah, and A. Muhyi. “Contemporary Traditions and Challenges: Tafsir Maudhu’i’s Study of Islam and Fundamentalism.” Bir, vol. 2, no. 2, 2024, pp. 181–198. https://doi.org/10.69526/bir.v2i2.7.
- Iosifyan, M., and O. Korolkova. “Emotions Associated with Different Textures During Touch.” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 71, 2019, pp. 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.012.
- Kilteni, K., and H. Ehrsson. “Predictive Attenuation of Touch and Tactile Gating Are Distinct Perceptual Phenomena.” iScience, vol. 25, no. 4, 2022, p. 104077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104077.
- Kilteni, K., B. Andersson, C. Houborg, and H. Ehrsson. “Motor Imagery Involves Predicting the Sensory Consequences of the Imagined Movement.” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03989-0.
- Kilteni, K., C. Houborg, and H. Ehrsson. “Rapid Learning and Unlearning of Predicted Sensory Delays in Self-Generated Touch.” eLife, vol. 8, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.42888.
- Kilteni, K., C. Houborg, and H. Ehrsson. “Brief Temporal Perturbations in Somatosensory Reafference Disrupt Perceptual and Neural Attenuation and Increase Supplementary Motor-Cerebellar Connectivity.” bioRxiv, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.25.517892.
- Kilteni, K., C. Houborg, and H. Ehrsson. “Brief Temporal Perturbations in Somatosensory Reafference Disrupt Perceptual and Neural Attenuation and Increase Supplementary Motor Area–Cerebellar Connectivity.” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 43, no. 28, 2023, pp. 5251–5263. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1743-22.2023.
- Kurotobi, T., T. Hoshino, Y. Kazami, F. Hayakawa, and Y. Hagura. “Relationship Between Sensory Analysis for Texture and Instrument Measurements in Model Strawberry Jam.” Journal of Texture Studies, vol. 49, no. 4, 2018, pp. 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12348.
- Küçükosmanoğlu, H., G. Coşkun, and H. Yosmaoğlu. “The Effect of Yoga Practice on Cervical Tactile Acuity and Body Awareness.” Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 130, no. 5, 2023, pp. 2031–2046. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125231187435.
- Laing, C., and J. Rankin. “Odds Ratios and Confidence Intervals.” Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, vol. 28, no. 6, 2011, pp. 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454211426575.
Image credit: Anupama Alias, The Pellucid Perspective, आवृत्ती ०७: हद्द/Edition 07: Boundary, May 2019.